AFCA names and shames 231 financial firms
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has publicly listed 231 financial firms potentially in breach of their licensing obligations by failing to declare their membership of the new dispute resolution scheme.
AFCA said it was working closing with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and said the regulator would be taking appropriate action against the firms, which were likely to be in breach of their legal obligations under their financial services or credit licences.
AFCA chief executive and chief ombudsman, David Locke, said the body had been working with ASIC to contact the firms about their requirement to take out AFCA membership since August, but despite several communications, the firms had failed to act.
“AFCA is the new one-stop-shop for external dispute resolution of financial complaints, and membership of AFCA is central to ensuring there is public trust in the financial services industry,” said Locke.
Locke said AFCA was unable to deal with complaints from consumers and small businesses about financial firm if the firm wasn’t an AFCA member, so registration of membership was critical to protecting this sector.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
Compared to four years ago when the divide between boutique and large licensees were largely equal, adviser movements have seen this trend shift in light of new licensees commencing.
As ongoing market uncertainty sees advisers look beyond traditional equity exposure, Fidante has found adviser interest in small caps and emerging markets for portfolio returns has almost doubled since April.
CoreData has shared the top areas of demand for cryptocurrency advice but finds investors are seeking advisers who actively invest in the asset themselves.
With regulators ‘raising the bar’ on retirement planning, Lonsec Research and Ratings has urged advisers to place greater focus on sequencing and longevity risk as they navigate clients through the shifting landscape.
