Letting go of the baggage

FPA fpa chief executive commissions fpa members financial planning association financial advisers financial planning industry AFA association of financial advisers chief executive federal government

18 May 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The move by the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) to not support the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) proposal to transition away from commissions-based financial advice would have come as little surprise to FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch.

In disagreeing with the FPA’s consultation paper proposing the move away from commissions, AFA national president Jim Taggart asserted that members did not want nor expect their professional body to tell them how to run their businesses.

Many members of the FPA will probably find themselves agreeing with Taggart. Indeed, in all likelihood, a number of those members will see fit to resign their membership of the FPA and sign up with the AFA.

But while Taggart may have spoken the very words that some FPA members have been thinking, he and his board are clearly viewing the AFA’s role as that of a traditional industry association rather than a professional body.

The FPA’s approach is more about being a professional association. Very much tied up in the FPA’s position on commissions is an acknowledgement that advice needs to be clearly separated from product sales before advisers can be seen to be truly independent and therefore lay claim to professionalism.

Therefore, as the debate moves forward, financial advisers will need to make a choice about how they perceive the future of their industry and, by definition, how their industry is perceived by consumers.

What needs to be understood by all concerned in the debate is the reality that the Federal Government was highly likely to have moved on the commissions issue if the industry had not.

It ought follow, therefore, that while changing industry organisations might give planners some small satisfaction, it is unlikely to alter the reality that the commissions regime, as it currently exists, is not politically sustainable.

The financial planning industry, as it is now constructed, is carrying with it a good deal of negative baggage. For better or worse, a change to the commissions regime represents a chance to jettison some of that baggage and the perceptions that go with it.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

2 days 7 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

2 days 7 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

3 days 2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND