Is IFSA interested in financial planners?
The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) held its annual conference on the Gold Coast last week and, in light of recent events, readers of Money Management may care to reflect upon whom the organisation really represents.
IFSA’s lists reveal that it can lay claim to a membership that encompasses funds managers, banks, insurers, superannuation funds and dealer groups. But in whose interests does it really act?
IFSA asserts that any organisation actively participating in the managed investments, superannuation or life insurance industries is eligible for full voting membership.
It then states that any organisation that provides professional and other services to the managed investments, superannuation or life insurance industries and supports the objectives of the association is eligible for non-voting supporting membership, including law firms, accounting firms, custodians, software providers, advisory and consulting firms.
Perhaps, though, the most telling indicator of who IFSA really represents is the make-up of its board, currently led by the chief executive of Perpetual, David Deverall, and boasting the chief executives of fund managers, insurers and other product manufacturers.
The voice of financial planning is arguably conveyed by people such as Colonial First State’s Brian Bissaker and AMP’s Craig Meller.
In other words, the IFSA view of financial planning is very much the view conveyed by full members such as MLC, AMP and Aviva. Dealer group Professional Investment Services is a full member, but Count Financial is a supporting member.
So the bottom line for financial planners is that the degree to which they can expect their interests to be represented by IFSA is dependent upon whether they are allied to the likes of AMP, Macquarie or Colonial First State.
There was a time when it was argued that an organisation such as IFSA was capable of representing the interests of the entire financial services industry. Recent events, including the Federal Government’s intra-fund advice regime decision, suggest IFSA is best at representing those to whom it grants full membership.
Financial planners may often be vocally critical of theFinancial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers(AFA), but they can be in no doubt about whose interests the two organisations really represent.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
In the latest episode of Relative Return Insider, host Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and AMP’s Shane Oliver break down US and Australian rate cuts, soaring gold, and bitcoin’s volatility.
In the latest episode of the Relative Return Insider, host Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and AMP’s chief economist Shane Oliver unpack the surprising twists in the Australian economy, diving into the latest GDP numbers, what’s really driving consumer spending, and what it all means for the Reserve Bank’s next moves.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew chats with Roy Keenan, co-head of fixed income at Yarra Capital Management, to discuss the evolving fixed income asset class, his sector preferences, and the RBA’s rate-cutting policy.
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Insider, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver joins the show to dissect the ongoing government economic reform roundtable and reflect on the wish lists of industry stakeholders – and whether there is hope for meaningful reform.
