Financial reform demands financial literacy
A common theme of submissions to the Financial Systems Review is a call for higher levels of financial literacy, but this needs to be coupled with a message around the value of good advice.
If the various financial services submissions filed with David Murray’s Financial Systems Review have a common theme it is that while consumer protection is generally regarded as a priority, consumers themselves must take more responsibility for ensuring they understand the decisions they are being asked to make.
In other words, a strong theme across many submissions is that consumers need to be better educated about financial products and services so that they can make better decisions assisted by trusted advisers such as accountants and financial planners.
It was a theme at the core of the submission filed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants and it was something echoed in the submissions filed by both the Commonwealth Bank and the ANZ.
Over the past two decades, successive Governments have talked the talk on financial literacy and there have been some high profile campaigns suggesting that they have also tried to walk the walk.
But, in reality, the level of expenditure directed towards financial literacy has been comparatively modest when weighted against other Government-backed campaigns.
Thus, when debacles such as the collapse of Storm Financial and the failure of some agricultural Managed Investment Schemes have occurred, the finger of blame has been pointed at financial planners and others with little thought given to whether the consumers themselves might have acted in their own best interests.
It might be asked to what degree some basic knowledge around the workings of financial products might have assisted the victims of the Storm Financial collapse to recognise the dangers of triple leverage, or the punters who invested in agricultural managed investment schemes to understand that the value of tax deductibility might be outweighed by the risk to their underlying capital.
The reality, of course, is that Australians are in 2014 vastly more economically and financially literate than they were two decades ago, with higher levels of share ownership thanks to the floating of companies such as Telstra, AMP Limited and the NRMA.
Soon, it seems, they will have an opportunity to invest in the initial public offering of Medibank Private.
But the reality of offerings such as those wrapped up in the Storm advice model and those entailing investing in agricultural schemes is that they entail complexities and risks which are often best left to more sophisticated investors with a more intimate understanding and vastly deeper pockets.
It is to be hoped that the Financial Systems Review does, indeed, recommend that the Government devote more funding and resources towards higher levels of financial literacy, but this needs to be coupled with encouragement of people to seek professional financial advice when dealing with more sophisticated investments.
Many people self-medicate. The smart ones know when it’s time to see a doctor.
Recommended for you
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Insider, hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford take a final look at the lay of the land ahead of the federal election as the latest polls predict a Labor victory, and what that could mean for Australians going forward.
In this week’s special edition of Relative Return Insider, we bring you outgoing Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones’ keynote from Momentum Media’s Election 2025 event, followed by a Q&A focused on the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms.
In this week’s episode of Relative Return Unplugged, Dr Vladimir Tyazhelnikov from the University of Sydney’s School of Economics joins the show to break down the shifting sands of global trade dynamics and attempt to understand the way US President Donald Trump is employing tariffs.
In this week’s special episode of Relative Return Unplugged, we present shadow treasurer Angus Taylor’s address at Momentum Media’s Election 2025 event, followed by a Q&A covering the Coalition’s plans for the financial services sector.
