Submitted by Ross Smith on Tue, 2024-03-12 09:12

,... "targeting areas .. Cover a greater scope of operators in the financial services market (including, for example, non-AFSL holders)." Why do AFSL licensees have to pay the financial adviser's levy for ASIC investigation and enforcement costs on non-AFSL holders, amounting to $46.4 million in 2022-23, when AFSL holders have done nothing wrong? Why does this appear to be a breach of Common Law in respect of procedural justice and distributive fairness in abusing AFSL licensees that were Invoiced $46.4 million on 29 January 2024?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Michael Chalmers

Meanwhile the government says it wants to lower the cost of advice. The governments regulator is ballooning how much t...

15 hours 31 minutes ago
Chris Cornish

If an adult signs a form stipulating a payment to occur, that should be the end of the matter - no need for the governme...

16 hours 33 minutes ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Commissioner Hayne recommended Consent Forms to stop Bank Executives [not Advisers] illegally taking fees out of consume...

16 hours 53 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago