Submitted by Interested reader on Tue, 2023-12-12 09:45

I think those that work for banks and superfunds should be called 'Product Financial Advisers'. They're not holistic financial planners. All advisers and planners should be qualified so the concept of 'qualified adviser' should apply to everyone. It's too generic as a concept. And lets pause for a moment to reflect on the constant legislative change that the actual financial planning profession has been put through over the past two decades. I can't think of another sector that has been through so much change. Some of this latest change though feels to set back the improvements made and turn the industry into a profession. My own strong opinion is that verticial integration should have been removed. Advice should be allowed to self-actualise without products lurking in the background.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

11 hours 43 minutes ago
Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

13 hours 46 minutes ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

16 hours 37 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago