Submitted by Troy McPhee on Thu, 2023-12-07 20:33

by virtue of receiving a salary from an insto offering a product, these so called "qualified advisers" are conflicted by advising client's to remain invested in the product offered by the same company who pays their salary - I'm appalled by this development and I can't un-see the political nature of this decision with Labor lining the pockets of their Union-owned Super funds (putting members first they say....?!?!)

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ross Smith

Sorry, every July I meet with each client who signs off on their FDS which disclosed adviser fees paid for the last 12 m...

23 hours ago
Michael Chalmers

Meanwhile the government says it wants to lower the cost of advice. The governments regulator is ballooning how much t...

1 day 1 hour ago
Chris Cornish

If an adult signs a form stipulating a payment to occur, that should be the end of the matter - no need for the governme...

1 day 2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago