Submitted by Les on Thu, 2023-12-07 12:35

It has me nonplussed how anyone thinks that a change to the SoA document requirements will lower fees? The time cost is in gathering and recording information, due diligence and research, crossing I's and T's, and making sure the file stacks up for the inevitable presentation to AFCA! The SoA is but a summary of everything that has taken place to that point! Like it or not costs will not reduce significantly amount to allow an entry point to professional advice for the masses. And, like it or not the SoA as it stands, is a valuable point of reference to reflect back on when determining if a clients circumstances remain the same, and if the started objectives are being met ongoing. Of all the changes I have experienced in my long career, I find this right up there with the most pointless and frustrating.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

25 minutes 4 seconds ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

3 hours 16 minutes ago
Ross Smith

Sorry, every July I meet with each client who signs off on their FDS which disclosed adviser fees paid for the last 12 m...

1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago