Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...
Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...
Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...
AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....
A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...
The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....
I'm a mature adviser with 45 years of experience in Financial Services with several General Management role in Life Insurance Companies, Financial Planning Businesses and Retail Banks. I have been a Financial Planner for 21 years.
I have no objection to other than licensed advisors giving advice, so long as, for whatever type of advice we are providing it requires the same education, documentation and liability. Simplistically, if giving interfund advice which almost certainly will involve some level of personal details, we should have the same requirements as a superannuation fund employee/adviser, otherwise this just becomes a penalty for going through the whole education/professionalism process. In addition, having advice costs charged against a fund, rather than the individuals account, in my view, discriminates against those members who choose to have their advice provided by an external entity.