Submitted by Aleycat on Wed, 2023-05-03 11:33

Renato, what you have said is a "crock".

Finfluencers do not play within the operating parameters required by those who do, that are actually licenced to provide financial advice and education.

The profession/industry has had a plethora of legislative changes over the past 23 years in an attempt to protect the public against false and misleading claims by the unscrupulous.
Now you believe anyone who thinks they know more than those working full time as practitioners should be doling out advice to the gullible because they relate to a similar age demographic.

Who did you have in mind, one of the Kardashians ?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Time to Go

I really can't see how getting rid of the safeguards with no other changes achieves anything at all. We're still the ea...

19 hours 39 minutes ago
Rob

Nowhere else in the world do innocent bystanders have to pay for the losses incurred to investors due to failed business...

22 hours 51 minutes ago
Time to Go

Yet everything states profitability is much higher in a larger practice. As a smaller planning practice it is a hard sl...

2 days 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago