Retain life insurance commission: FPA
The Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA) has rejected proposals to ban commissions as it could leave consumers chronically underinsured and dependant on social security.
There had been a number of calls for the banning of all remaining conflicts of interests including life insurance commission, in light of the Quality of Advice Review’s proposals on the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).
This had been proposed by consumer advocacy groups such as Choice and Industry Super Australia.
FPA chief executive, Sarah Abood, said: “By banning commissions, we’d effectively be removing consumers’ ability to choose how they wish to pay for their advice.
“Multiple research studies have shown that a high proportion of consumers would not purchase insurance at all if they were required to pay an upfront fee. So the result would be that far fewer Australians would have appropriate insurance protection in place.”
Retail advised new life insurance business volumes were already expected to fall over the next few years as the number of advisers providing advice on life insurance had declined and the remuneration for this had also declined.
She said she welcomed the findings by the Review that showed a significant improvement in quality of life insurance advice provided over the past four years and said this was being disregarded by those who sought a commission ban.
“This improvement has not been acknowledged by consumer groups. These groups have taken a position that it is impossible to deliver a quality service to consumers where any conflict exists, but the data shows this is not the case.”
The FPA had previously stated it would like to see the two ASIC life insurance advice file reviews and a life insurance data collection used for the review to be further assessed to properly determine the outcome.
Recommended for you
Financial services lawyers believe the government may have good intentions, but the proposed legislation leaves superannuation trustees targeting an unachievable “standard of perfection” when it comes to advice deductions.
Advisers could find themselves unable to receive the fair market price of their advice as the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes legislation states superannuation trustees can reject deductions that are not charged on a cost basis.
Two advice professionals have shared five key takeaways as to how advisers can strengthen their communication with clients, especially at review time, in order to build deeper relationships.
The Financial Services Council has launched the Digital Advice Expert Group to support policy development around digital advice adoption and ensure greater accessibility for Australians.
Still haven't seen one premium go down since they saved so much money on commissions... Royal Commission into the insurance industry and the LIF review I think.
Best not say that out loud - the Consumer Groups and the Bureaucrats in ASIC/Treasury probably haven't yet been told this (they would need to spend Millions of $$$$ doing a study to find this out) and if they knew, would likely just blame it on Putin. Lets face it facts, it is very unlikely Commissions were reduced to help consumers - I reckon they just want Financial Planners out of way so Product Manufactures can control delivery via Industry Super - but I could be wrong?
Add new comment