Submitted by Ross Smith on Tue, 2024-03-12 09:12

,... "targeting areas .. Cover a greater scope of operators in the financial services market (including, for example, non-AFSL holders)." Why do AFSL licensees have to pay the financial adviser's levy for ASIC investigation and enforcement costs on non-AFSL holders, amounting to $46.4 million in 2022-23, when AFSL holders have done nothing wrong? Why does this appear to be a breach of Common Law in respect of procedural justice and distributive fairness in abusing AFSL licensees that were Invoiced $46.4 million on 29 January 2024?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

3 hours ago
Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

5 hours ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

7 hours 55 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago