Submitted by Grahame Evans on Mon, 2024-03-11 10:53

Just as an aside, service companies which advice businesses are generally, have the salary bill, the highest expense and mostly above 50% and commonly 60%+.
With other inputs like PI, financial planning software, paraplanning and premises (and in some cases dealer fees) you can see why the salaries as a %, are such a large input. Some financial statements for some reason show the principals salaries below the line which is not justifiable in my mind unless they weren't doing any work. This may distort the real % and in many cases the profit view. Realistically all salaries need to be included but principal's salaries can be normalised in the case of selling the business to substitute with the cost of employing someone to do the principal's work.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

1 day 14 hours ago
Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

1 day 16 hours ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

1 day 19 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago