Submitted by Les on Thu, 2023-12-07 12:35

It has me nonplussed how anyone thinks that a change to the SoA document requirements will lower fees? The time cost is in gathering and recording information, due diligence and research, crossing I's and T's, and making sure the file stacks up for the inevitable presentation to AFCA! The SoA is but a summary of everything that has taken place to that point! Like it or not costs will not reduce significantly amount to allow an entry point to professional advice for the masses. And, like it or not the SoA as it stands, is a valuable point of reference to reflect back on when determining if a clients circumstances remain the same, and if the started objectives are being met ongoing. Of all the changes I have experienced in my long career, I find this right up there with the most pointless and frustrating.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

What does he do after three years???.He sits FEW EXAMS GETS THEM RIGHT ONCE and he can apply again promising to be a go...

1 day 1 hour ago
Ross Smith

I have been making this advocation for more than 10 years, that banning a financial adviser like this is hopeless like a...

1 day 1 hour ago
Simon

...and not to forget if I'm a butcher, a baker, or candle stick maker then I'm a 'Qualified Adviser'!!! - sorry couldn't...

1 day 2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago