Submitted by TimMelb on Mon, 2023-07-17 15:37

to whoever writes or categorizes this rubbish, can you please stop referring to super funds as 'balanced'. Some of these funds have nothing to do with balanced options. Alot of these funds have more than 80% in aggressive assets. How in any universe does this count as 'balanced'. This leads to people to wrong comparisons, potentially poor decisions & lack of investigation of the risks. Let's start having all of these funds quote the highest aggressive allocation held throughout the year to see how they truly compare. Now that's a compare the pair analysis I'd love to see !!!!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon J

What do you think the motivation is behind this broadly worded legislation Peter? Is it to make it harder for retail ...

11 hours 41 minutes ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

The FSC should have thought about this when they cooperated with O'Dywer/Frydenberg/Hume/FPA/AFA 10 years ago when this...

14 hours ago
Simon J

Sick of it. Canberra is a joke....

15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago