Submitted by Realistic on Thu, 2023-02-09 17:04

However, she stressed product issuers would not be legally required to accept the form.

Yeah, A trustee might not approve of a Financial Planner not under the control of the Trustee providing Advice on an area for which the Trustee is already charging the member - even when the member is not using that service?

Any yearly form needed providing consent for the Trustee to charge a members Retirement savings for advice provided to other members (you did say so the trustee can retain FUM) who has not used the Trustees Advice? Guess not.

Well done Michelle Levey - you do seem to have thought of it all?

Honestly - had to make this stuff up.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Gee

Not possible to coninue if the cost is given to remaining advisors ...

2 days 11 hours ago
Murray Wilkinson

In Australia this was the country of a "Fair Go". This Government is using us. We need direct action and we need to figh...

2 days 14 hours ago
mark mclennan

I am reading a lot about the unfairness of CSLR, QAR etc etc and it is clear that there is massive inequity taking place...

2 days 17 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago