ASIC warns planners on death nomination practices
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has put the financial advice sector on notice regarding the widespread practice of failing to correctly witness binding death nomination forms for superannuation benefits.
This followed ASIC’s discovery that many financial advisers either witness or have staff members witness client signatures on the binding forms without being in the presence of the signatory. They also found that forms had been backdated.
These practices do not comply with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and may result in the forms being invalid, which could lead to the rejection of the death nomination.
Peter Kell, acting ASIC chair said that Australian Financial Services (AFS) licensees, advisers and their staff should consider this a final warning against engaging in these practices.
He particularly emphasised that licensees would be held responsible for misconduct in this regard.
“AFS licensees have ultimate responsibility for the conduct of their representatives and need to effectively monitor and supervise their representatives,” Kell said.
ASIC said that AFS licensees must train staff on their professional and ethical obligations, monitor and supervise their representatives, remediate consumers where misconduct is found, and identify breaches in a timely manner.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
