Vertically-integrated instos skewing FSC: ClearView
The dominance of large vertically integrated institutions within the Financial Services Council (FSC) means the organisation cannot deliver pro-consumer and pro-competition outcomes with respect to insurance approved product lists (APLs), according to one of the FSC's own member companies, ClearView Wealth.
In a hard-hitting submission filed with the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, ClearView claimed the Government and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had effectively granted the FSC the right to legislate by the APL Standard and to deal with monitoring and enforcement of the APL Standard through the FSC's self-regulatory role.
It said that this position was consistent with the FSC's position with respect to the development of a Life Code of Conduct.
"While ClearView is currently a member of FSC, we have reluctantly reached the view that the pro-consumer, pro-competition outcomes sought by the Government will not be achieved if the FSC is permitted to continue its current course in developing its APL standard," the ClearView submission said.
"This assessment results from the dominant position taken within the FSC by large, vertically-integrated institutions who have no motivation to agree to a standard that would remove or even reduce current anti-competitive practices or that would promote competition, innovation or greater choice for advisers and consumers," it said.
Elsewhere in its submission, ClearView pointed to the insurance APLs of major vertically-integrated institutions as being populated by in-house products noting that such narrow APLs were designed to influence advice recommendations and channel clients into those in-house products.
"Any process in place to recommend products not included on the APL is typically cumbersome and dissuasive," the submission said. "The institutions make money from the widespread distribution (sale) of their products by aligned advisers."
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
