No recourse to members’ money for super funds that err

superannuation/financial-accountability-regime/FSC/super-funds/superannuation-funds/Financial-Services/RSE/

27 February 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Superannuation funds and their executives who are found to have failed in their duties under the Government’s proposed new Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) will not be able to rely on members’ funds to bail them out.

That will be one of the key bottom lines of the Government’ proposed new Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) with exposure draft reveal that superannuation fund licensees will be prohibited form using trust assets to pay a civil penalty arising from breaching an obligation under the FAR.

What is more, it is unclear the degree to which superannuation funds or other financial services businesses will be able to insure against such eventualities.

The maximum penalties under the FAR are significant with the Financial Services Council (FSC) noting that the penalties are to be the greater of:

  1. $10.5 million (50,000 penalties units);
  2. The benefit derived/detriment avoided by the entity because of the contravention multiplied by three (where this can be determined by the court); or
  3. 10% of the annual turnover of the body corporate (capped at $525 million or 2.5 million penalty units).

Responding to a discussion paper on the new FAR, the FSC said that, “interestingly, in the case of RSE [superannuation] licensees, it is noted that RSE licensees will be prohibited from using trust assets to pay a civil penalty arising from breaching an obligation under the FAR”.

It said that provision would be made for the court to have regard to the impact of the penalty on the trustee’s superannuation fund membership.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo