IOOF faces class action

Sydney law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has announced its intention to file a class action against IOOF Holdings Limited in the wake of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking Superannuation and Financial Services Industry and action by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

The company said it would be acting on behalf of investors who purchased shares in the company between 27 May 2015 to 6 December 2018 with the litigation backed by litigation funder, the Regency Group.

The law firm said the action arose form evidence given at the Royal Commission that subsidiaries of IOOF breached their duties as superannuation trustees and that directors and officers of IOOF were well aware of those breaches.

Related News:

It noted that in the wake of these allegations, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) launched legal proceedings against those subsidiaries and directors of IOOF, seeking amongst other things, to disqualify those directors from acting as superannuation trustees.

“From August 2018 to the announcement of the APRA action in December 2018, IOOF shares plummeted to a five-year low – dropping more than 35 per cent,” the law firm said.

Quinn Emanuel said its class action would allege that IOOF was aware that its conduct would have significant legal and regulatory risks.

It noted that during the period 27 May 2015 to 6 December 2018, IOOF is alleged to have breached its continuous disclosure obligations and engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct.




Related Content

IOOF’s OnePath transaction gets parliamentary scrutiny

A key parliamentary committee has thrown more focus on the future of IOOF’s acquisition of the ANZ’s OnePath pensions and investments busi...Read more

Advisers and clients the best judges of SMSF appropriateness

The appropriateness and desirability of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) are matters for clients and their advisers to work out, and ought no...Read more

AFA hits Hayne on intra-fund advice failing

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has continued to rail against the findings of the Royal Commission pointing out that it had failed to unde...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Whenever there is adverse reporting about any company without clearly defined reasoning, there is always going to be negative reactions
IOOF continues to make a profit and is in a strong position
This attempted class action will fail
Is there a class action against the commonwealth Bank or NAB?
APRA are taking on IOOF because they were kicked clearly up the behind by a Royal Commission that has done so much damage as a result of its intentionally nasty probing

Yes indeed. How dare IOOF be stopped from or punished for ripping off Australian citizens.

Know your facts first

You tell your facts to back your statements on IOOF.

What is this? Tit for tat. If you have nothing to say, don't be annoying

Hedware, refer to other posts re inter fund fees for facts on ripping off retail Australian customers.

That's right Hedware!! How dare IOOF rip off customers as that is Hedware job!!! Keep the dream alive Hedware

Add new comment