Choice wants voice on RC rectification taskforce

Consumer group Choice wants a voice on a Treasury taskforce, funded by the Government, to implement the policy reforms recommended by the Banking Royal Commission, arguing that self-regulation has demonstrably failed.

At the same time, the consumer group pointed to the exit of the major banks from the financial planning industry and has argued that they may be replaced by smaller groups less capable of compensating consumers.

In a pre-Budget submission filed with Treasury, Choice has claimed it is essential that consumer groups are recognised as “key stakeholders”.

Related News:

“What is clear from the evidence of the Financial Services Royal Commission is that self-regulation - that is, banks writing their own unenforceable rules - has demonstrably failed and has led to widespread consumer harm,” the submission said. “Well-funded industry lobbyists will seek to hijack the policy process, and water-down consumer protections.”

The submission said that this had been evidenced by the “industry’s attempts to water down protections in the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms, and in the final result of a year’s worth of consultations on the Life Insurance in Superannuation Code (the final result being a voluntary, unenforceable code)”.

“It is essential that consumer groups are supported to take the lead in this reform process and that Treasury resources allow for time to engage with consumer groups and properly review industry claims,” the Choice submission said.

On the question of funding a compensation scheme of last resort, Choice pointed to the heightened risk of “an environment where large financial providers with significant capital holdings move away from the advice sector”.

“Taking their place is likely to be a series of smaller advice businesses who is many cases will not have the resources to compensate consumers for improper advice which leads to loss,” it said.

“This is best evidenced in the collapse of Dover Financial Services, an entity that arguably folded due to revelations of misconduct made public in their appearance before the Royal Commission. Dover Financial Services had an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 clients,” the submission said. “These clients are now not able to access external dispute mechanisms, such as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. If any of these clients had a complaint against the company, they will struggle to get fair compensation.”




Related Content

RC didn’t dive deep enough on superannuation

AustralianSuper’s chief executive, Ian Silk, has suggested that the Banking Royal Commission didn’t cast a stern enough eye over parts of the supe...Read more

IOOF’s OnePath transaction gets parliamentary scrutiny

A key parliamentary committee has thrown more focus on the future of IOOF’s acquisition of the ANZ’s OnePath pensions and investments busi...Read more

APRA thinks financial institutions got nailed by RC

The chairman of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Wayne Byres, thinks the Royal Commission’s final report placed responsibi...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

I'm sure they do. They seem to be making good money recently - and more to come.
If their services are so good, surely they could simply offer it for a fee rather than the tax payer picking up their fee.

Choice have no idea about financial services and should stick to the simple tasks they can get their minds around like comparing electirity rates and phone deals.

Yes, an irresponsible, half baked, left wing lobby group governed, not by the paying members, but a select, self appointed, hard core collection of Lefties. The governance committee is closely allied with "Adviser Ratings" which is nothing but a scam. "Choice" was started by the Marxist Economist "Red" Ted Wheelwright and the governing body have maintained traditions started by Ted. Politics first and Consumers just simply willing funders blind to the real aims of "Choice".
Yes Choice would like more access to the Public Purse, I'm sure!

Choice by name but not by nature!

Choice and CALC should both be prosecuted for masquerading as "consumer" groups. They do not even understand consumers, let alone represent them. They are just left wing lobby groups trying to impose their hard core ideology on others.

Choice are merely poorly informed perpetual salary drawing journalists who have no idea about running a business and who sensationalise and propagate fabrications. They even set-up their own Mortgage Broking business several years ago to "Beat The Banks" and "Beat The Brokers" but then quickly faded into the sunset when they learned they couldn't survive. Purely "salaried" Nay Sayers with zero business acumen who only know how to criticise. Perhaps they can establish "Choice Financial Planning" and show us all how it's done.....sustainably.

Add new comment