AFA urges Bill Shorten's direct involvement

fpa-chief-executive/afa-chief-executive/government/financial-advisers/industry-super-network/FOFA/financial-planning-association/FPA/AFA/association-of-financial-advisers/chief-executive/

22 March 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Amid continuing fall-out over a document purporting to reflect a deal on the Future of Financial Advice changes between the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Industry Super Network (ISN), the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has called on the Government to act directly rather than through intermediaries.

AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said his organisation was calling on the Government to act in the national interest and work directly with the industry to achieve the required changes rather than through the ISN.

At the same time, FPA chief executive Mark Rantall issued an email to all members of his organisation disowning the content of the document and stating "the FPA [has] never and does not support opt-in".

Commenting on the origins of the document, Klipin said that if the ISN was acting as a de facto policy maker for the Government, it was time for such activity to end.

"In the interests of consumers and the people who serve them, the Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation [Bill Shorten] must fully focus on good policy," he said.

Klipin said the ISN had spent countless millions on advertising campaigns over a decade or more doggedly maligning financial advisers and undermining the value of advice, and therefore the ISN's role in the FOFA debate needed to be put into context.

Further, he said the AFA believed the actions of the ISN had unfairly influenced the FOFA debate - something which gave rise to the need for Shorten to convene a meeting of the key stakeholders to finalise all the key issues.

"This is the only way to serve the national, rather than sectional, interests," he said.

In his email to members Rantall pointed out that the FPA had worked for many years with many stakeholders to get opt-in removed "along with [promoting] other sensible concessions like a 12-month transition period, removal of additional disclosure requirements and sensible best interest amendments to allow for scaled advice".

"We are continuing to work on those concessions and more on your behalf even as the legislation is being debated," his email said.

"We cannot guarantee the final outcome as that is in the hands of the Government and the independents, but we will continue to fight for what is in the best interest of members and the professional. That includes the removal of opt-in." 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND