Clicky

Lawyers urge RC to inject more transparency into insurance

Superannuation fund members too often do not understand the scope of their insurance coverage and do not realise they are signed to a policy with sub-standard terms, according to the Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA).

In a submission responding to the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, the ALA has called for the introduction of a ratings system and clear fact sheets to make it easier for consumers to understand the costs and benefits of the death and disability insurance within their superannuation.

The ALA has backed automatic death and total and permanent disability (TPD) insurance cover in superannuation as an overwhelmingly successful means of mitigating Australian households’ serious underinsurance gap but is arguing that consumers need more information.

Related News:

“It has been, and remains, an invaluable resource for disabled workers and their dependants who often have no other means of managing medical retirement besides resorting to Centrelink,” ALA spokesperson, Josh Mennen said. “However, more information needs to be provided to consumers so that they can understand and compare the differences in coverage available and the expected costs of this coverage – and avoid signing up for ‘junk’ insurance policies that are of little value.”

“Too often consumers are not fully aware of the scope of their insurance coverage and do not realise that they are signed to a policy with sub-standard terms,” he said.

“A ratings system should be developed with tiered TPD definition classes to ensure that consumers can make like-for-like comparisons,” Mennen said. “For example, a policy with definitions that are consistent with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (SIS) superannuation early release provisions could be a Tier 1 policy and the use of ‘unable’ definitions is a Tier 2; a retraining clause is a Tier 3; pre-existing exclusion clause a Tier 4; an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) test Tier 5; and so on.”

He said that under such arrangements, consumers could clearly see where their TPD cover sat in comparative terms.

“We also recommend that facts-sheets provided by insurers should compare the cost of the premium with equivalent cover available in a benchmarked retail product for someone of the same demographic as the consumer,” Mennen said.

“As we have seen many times, inadequate insurance coverage can result in extreme financial hardship in the case of unexpected injury or illness. Clearer information in the form of a ratings system would make it possible for consumers to better choose insurance to meet their needs and avoid signing up for policies that are not best practice.”




Related Content

Despite everything, people still trust their banks

Despite many of the highly adverse findings of the Royal Commission, new research suggests that most Australians continue to trust their banks.The res...Read more

RC sees industry funds increase satisfaction lead over retail

As the banks face issues with customer satisfaction so too have their associated super funds, with Roy Morgan finding that industry funds have increas...Read more

Lawyers urge RC to inject more transparency into insurance

Superannuation fund members too often do not understand the scope of their insurance coverage and do not realise they are signed to a policy with sub-...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Why isn't Super part of ur Will? It will be the largest asset for many. With 40% of people priced out of home ownership they therefore won't need a Will if all they have to leave is Super. Why binding and non binding? Why isn't a nomination just that. Most people don't know these things. Upset Rowena Orr didn't get to argue this at RC. When this is compulsory it is wrong. Super funds actively contact anyone to see if they want to apply for a deceased members death benefit and whatever that member has contributed. It is ur money is the catchcry of the Finds. ..until you die then they decide who will get it even if u have a Will and a nomination, not married and no children but have had a boy/girlfriend for 6 months. This has to change. No political party has ever looked at this SIS legislation since it was introduced in 1993 and 1997 when it was amended. The public should know this and everyone is kept on the dark. It's not put out there. Ads like it's ur money, Kelly O'Dwyer at National Press Club " it's not the fund's money, not the bank's money, it's ur money" ... untilbu die!!! she should have added. It has taken almost 8 months after my son's death and still no answer on who gets his Super. The stress is unbelievable, paying his mortgage.Can't rent his property. A nightmare!!

Add new comment