Lawyer warning on LIF adviser fee anomoly

LIF life insurance commissions fee-for-service

9 December 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

There is a danger that adviser fees for insurance advice could form part of the capped benefits component under the new Life Insurance Framework (LIF), according to financial services lawyer, Ian McDermott.

McDermott said that while the proposed changes may have been broadly welcomed by the industry, the drafting of the remuneration cap provisions appeared to have created an anomaly which needed to be rectified before the legislation was finalised.

McDermott, the principal of imac legal & compliance, said it was pretty clear the proposed remuneration caps were only supposed to apply to commissions which have been deemed to be conflicted remuneration.

"However, the wording of the exposure draft legislation (Corporations Amendment (Life Insurance Remuneration Arrangements) Bill 2015), in particular the proposed new s963B(1)(b) and s963BA, are drafted so that they could put a limit on any benefit given in relation to a life risk insurance product, not just commissions," he said.

"This could potentially include any fee-for-service or hybrid commission/fee arrangements advisers put into place.

"Typically, fees-for-service do not come within the definition of conflicted remuneration. But the fear is that, because they may be charged in lieu of or in addition to insurance commissions, they will be deemed to have met the conflicted remuneration definition because the nature of the benefits or the circumstances in which they are given could reasonably be expected to influence the choice of financial product or the financial product advice itself," McDermott said.

"If that is the case, fees-for-service could come within the capped amount."

He said this represented an uncertainty in drafting that the industry could do without and that it would be best that the new legislation made it expressly clear that adviser fees-for-service, whether they be standalone or hybrid, are excluded from the calculation of the remuneration caps.

"I urge advisers, licensees and industry bodies to provide feedback to Treasury and Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as part of the consultation process to clarify and, if necessary, remove this anomaly," McDermott said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 weeks 5 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

5 days 14 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

2 weeks 5 days ago

A Melbourne financial advice firm has been put into liquidation by the Federal Court, and an appeal against its AFSL cancellation has been dismissed....

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS