ISN attacks FPA insurance commissions stance

FPA/commissions/insurance/fee-for-service/industry-super-funds/financial-planners/financial-planning-association/financial-advice-industry/industry-superannuation-funds/industry-super-network/financial-planning-industry/financial-planner/life-insurance/

18 March 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The Industry Super Network (ISN) has pointed to the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) statement on the retention of insurance commissions as proof that the financial advice industry cannot self-regulate against conflicts of interest.

The ISN, the body representing industry superannuation funds, argues commissions motivate financial planners to sell “unnecessary or excessively costly insurance, which workers could purchase more cheaply through their super fund”.

The ISN argued it has demonstrated that for most people, industry super funds can provide insurance at a “fraction” of the cost of a comparable product purchased through a financial planner.

However, the ISN didn’t point to the significant underinsurance problem evident in many industry funds. A 2008 survey by the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees and the Industry Funds Forum found that one in two industry fund members were underinsured by $100,000 or more. Rice Warner Actuaries has also estimated that life insurance cover within super is on average only 20 per cent of what is required.

ISN executive manager David Whiteley argues industry super funds have “led the way by providing affordable default cover that addresses the high levels of underinsurance in the community”.

The ISN wants to see financial advice provided on a fee-for-service basis. Whiteley argues the premium savings consumers will benefit from when not being placed in “unnecessary or excessively costly insurance” as advised by a financial planner — “often hundreds of dollars a year — will more than offset a fee-for-service charge”.

“It’s hard to believe that the FPA cares about the cost to consumers and is not simply preserving the insidious sources of revenue for financial planners,” Whiteley said.

“Rather than seeking to transform the financial planning industry into a profession, the FPA is advocating that financial planners return to their 1980s roots as an insurance product sales force.”

Furthermore Whiteley said the FPA had “walked away from their commitment to phase out commissions”.

“The FPA’s backsliding proves that the industry is unwilling to end the drain of commissions from workers’ saving.”

He argued that only regulation put in place by Government to ban commissions to financial planners will ensure super members receive appropriate and affordable insurance.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 2 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND