Insurer losses ‘self-inflicted’ - APRA

compliance/APRA/insurance-industry/

23 July 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Australian insurers have been guilty of the self-inflicted problems of very aggressive pricing, liberal terms and conditions and underwriting standards but many failed to act until they started incurring losses, according to Australian Prudential Regulation Authority deputy chairman, Ian Laughlin.

Giving evidence before a Parliamentary Committee, Laughlin painted a picture of an insurance industry which failed to heed the regulator's warnings until companies actually started incurring losses as a result of their "self-inflicted" problems.

Asked what had given rise to the losses incurred by the industry, Laughlin said there had been two broad issues - changes in social attitude to mental health had been "a bit of a surprise" and the involvement of lawyers in claims processing had changed dramatically recent times.

"And both of those things have increased claims," he said. "The industry was not necessarily well prepared for either of those, and in some ways that is understandable.

"On the other hand there are some self-inflicted problems — very aggressive pricing, terms and conditions that were also aggressive or very liberal, and underwriting standards that also were very liberal," Laughlin said.

"So those self-inflicted issues have been apparent for some period of time. So to us they were not a surprise; they were something that we had been talking to the industry about for a number of years."

Laughlin said the net result had been losses incurred by insurers and re-insurers and increases in premium rates, particularly with respect to group insurance, of up to 150 per cent — something which was highly undesirable because the costs flowed directly through to members.

He said that while APRA had expressed its significant concerns to the insurers for a number of years, they continued to remain profitable "so there was a reluctance on their part to actually change what they were doing".

"In more recent times they have suffered some losses, and they have been much more receptive to the idea that they needed to change practices," Laughlin said.

 

 

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5