Call for compulsory life insurance through super

life insurance insurance mortgage risk insurance superannuation industry federal government

29 June 2009
| By John Wilkinson |

A risk adviser has called for compulsory life insurance through superannuation for younger workers.

The Sherlock Group director Bruce Sherlock said there were too many cases of younger people being underinsured and partners being left in severe hardship when one of them dies or is disabled.

Sherlock has written to the Federal Government saying compulsory life insurance should be included in future changes to the superannuation industry.

He believes life insurance should be introduced as a compulsory measure from the beginning of a person’s working life until around the age of 45. Sherlock argues that later in life a person has paid off a considerable part of their mortgage and is starting to look towards superannuation to fund their retirement.

“The children are starting to go to university, they have paid off half or three-quarters of the mortgage, so they might only need to cover $250,000 to 300,000 of outstanding payments,” he said.

“I think there should be a mandatory minimum of six to 10-times annual earnings for full-time employees.”

For a young person applying for life cover, Sherlock said in most cases there would be no medical and with the tax deduction for the premium, they could be paying as little as $300 a year.

“The insurance would be provided through superannuation, with the option to refuse advice,” he said.

While there have been numerous attempts to educate the public about the merits of risk insurance, Sherlock admits a lot of these campaigns are still not hitting their audience.

Insurance levels, until very recently, have been at very low penetration, which he argues shows how few people think about risk insurance.

He said he sees people with a trauma that is fatal and the surviving partners receive a claim payment of less than $100,000, which is all the policy will pay.

“I would like to see compulsory life with the correct amount of insurance offered by both industry and retail funds,” Sherlock said.

“This would drastically reduce the pull on the public purse from families who have lost their breadwinner by allowing mortgages to be repaid and the surviving partner to retire in dignity.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

52 minutes 6 seconds ago
So happy to hear this

It couldn't happen to a more worthy organisation - good luck to the heroes coming to clean the place up!...

1 hour ago
Toni Watson

Yes used the money that should have been invested as if it was his own. Thought he was invincible but the house of cards...

2 hours 8 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND