Why we should rethink the 60/40 portfolio
The 60/40 portfolio split is too generic to accommodate a number of factors, including the fact not everybody has the same risk profile or is the same age away from retirement.
Speaking at a CFA Societies Australia webinar, Sebastian Page, T.Rowe Price’s head of global multi asset, spoke about his recently released book ‘Beyond Diversification – what every investor needs to know about asset allocation’.
“Given low expected returns going forward and given where rates are increasing longevity risk. The answer to the question ‘how much stocks should I own – should it be 60/40?’ is probably more than you think,” he said.
“If you look at our retirement target date strategies, someone who's 15 years from retirement… we think should hold about 85% of their portfolio in stocks.
“At retirement, the equity weight is still about 55%, which may seem high, but at 55 [years old], you're 10 years away from retirement. When you reach 65, you can expect to live for another 20 plus years.”
Page said the reason why the 60/40 advice was generic advice was because risk was not stable through time.
“On a rolling one-year basis, a 60/40 portfolio can deliver as much as 20% volatility, monthly returns, or as little as 5% depending on the market environment,” Page said.
“That’s the same asset mix… so it can look very aggressive when markets are volatile, or it can look very conservative in quiet times.
“Then you need to take into account the fact that capital markets have changed, interest rates are near an all time low, especially real interest rates, so this means if you want to maintain your expected return you need to take more risk.”
He said the financial industry was evolving to dynamically target risk rather than targeting allocation like the 60/40 split.
AUTHOR
Liam Cormican
Recommended for you
The merger with L1 Capital will “inject new life” into Platinum, Morningstar believes, but is unlikely to boost Platinum’s declining funds under management.
More than half of the top 20 most popular shares bought by advised investors during the first half of 2025 were ETFs, according to AUSIEX data.
At least two-thirds of ETF flows are understood to be driven by intermediaries, according to Global X, as net flows into Australian ETFs spike 97 per cent in the first half of 2025.
Inflows for the first half of 2025 for GQG Partners stand at US$8 billion, but the firm has flagged fund underperformance could be a headwind for future flows.
