Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Scientific Beta disagrees with exclusion of controversial weapons

scientific-beta/funds-management/Noel-Amenc/

22 February 2019
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image image
expand image

The smart beta index provider, Scientific Beta has disagreed with the recent announcement from MSCI to exclude controversial weapons from global cap-weighted indices.

According to Scientific Beta’s chief executive, Noel Amenc, there were no practical or academic grounds for the idea that a broad cap-weighted index representing all investment opportunities could not as a result contain an environmental, social and governance (ESG) filter by default.

Amenc also said, in response to Swiss Sustainable Finance’s open letter: “From a practical point of view, we know that the exclusions on controversial weapons proposed by Swiss Sustainable Finance represent a very marginal weight that in any event is far lower than the exclusions or weight limitations implemented by all index providers to guarantee the liquidity and investibility of their global cap-weighted indices.”

The firm said it believed that the cap-weighted index was the representation of the theoretical true market portfolio has no scientific credibility.

“We know that the cap-weighted index is ultimately an index like any other that has the particular virtue of providing the weighted average performance of the market, “he said.

“Excluding stocks that represent controversial weapons would not affect this average significantly.”

Scientific Beta, which does not provide broad cap-weighted index series, believed that promoting an opt-in option that corresponded to a paid service falls short of what is at stake with this exclusion from an ethical and humanitarian standpoint.

It admitted it was restricted by the failure of the major index providers to take a decision in this area. However, from June 2019, Scientific Beta committed to offering all its clients an ESG option on its smart beta index series, at no additional cost, that would provide for a minimal exclusion representing fewer than five per cent of the stocks in the global universe, without pre-empting a more active exclusion policy.

 

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND