Rethinking the stakeholder verses shareholder divide
Putting shareholders first is a long-held belief in business, but in the modern world, other stakeholders can be just as important, according to investment advocacy group FCLTGlobal.
Speaking at the CFA Societies Australian Investment Conference, Sarah Keohane Williamson, chief executive of FCLTGlobal, said organisations and investors should stop viewing meeting the needs of other stakeholders as a trade-off.
Instead, investors and businesses, and by extension policymakers, should “shift to an evaluation of investments in stakeholders, just like one would evaluate investments in other key elements of business strategy, such as technology, brand or traditional capex”.
Williamson said business leaders were not adequately moving in this direction, with 181 CEOs from the US’s Business Roundtable reneging on a 2019 agreement to lead for the benefit of all stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders.
She said the recent backlash against and subsequent disintegration of Europe’s football Super league, was an example of what could go wrong if stakeholders were not properly managed.
In this example, shareholder’s interests were put before the interests of fan’s which led to the demise of the proposed football league.
Stakeholder management should be authentic; it should not be corporate social responsibility, charity, short term environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals or about issues that do not pertain to the company’s core business, she said.
A good example of effective stakeholder management was Unilever’s distribution of free soap in Africa which, while coming at a cost financially, built the brand of the business and saved many lives.
“When the company wins, the employees, the customers, the other stakeholders [and] the shareholders have an opportunity to win. If the company doesn't succeed, none of those have the opportunity to win,” she said.
She said investors should put more pressure on businesses to effectively implement stakeholder management initiatives by asking management questions such as, ‘what is the expected return on investment of this stakeholder initiative?’ or ‘how long will the investment take to pay off?’
Williamson said the best companies in this space got ahead of the curve by internalising negative externalities before they were required to do so.
For example, Royal DSM, a Dutch multinational corporation active in the fields of health, nutrition and materials, enacted an internal carbon price before it was legislated.
AUTHOR
Liam Cormican
Recommended for you
Having officially opened its doors, ETF Shares – led by three former Global X employees – has now launched its first three ETF vehicles on Cboe Australia for financial advisers.
Platinum Asset Management has lost a near-$1 billion institutional mandate as data shows its funds under management fell below $10 billion in April.
Betashares and Global X have announced they will both be launching new products focused on defined income bonds and Chinese technology, respectively.
Sydney investment manager Vado Private has welcomed a new director and head of funds management to its team as it seeks to grow its presence in the Australian private credit market.
