Platforms a double-edged sword



The gatekeeper role that platforms play in determining which investments are easily available presents a huge challenge for the direct property sector, according to a panel discussion hosted by research firm Property Investment Research (PIR).
Speaking on the panel, AMP head of product research and approved product list management Brad Matthews said a large number of advisers achieve efficiency through platforms.
"At the moment we'd say direct property is on the fringe of the mainstream investments for planners, and a key reason for this is because of the lack of assets offered on platforms," he said.
Matthews added that liquidity concerns should not prevent direct property investments from being included on platforms.
"Property investments coming out at the moment are of a higher quality and more client-oriented than previously; however, this hasn't translated into strong representation on platforms," Matthews said.
"In the past liquidity was a critical characteristic for getting on a platform; however it shouldn't be the case that something has to be liquid to get onto one, providing investors are aware of the liquidity restrictions," he said.
Richard Stacker from Charter Hall said there was opportunity for unlisted products to get on to platforms but it needed to be a collaborative process.
"Product providers need to work alongside dealer groups and platform providers to ensure the structures of new products meet the needs of investors but also the platforms, to help bring direct property investments into the mainstream financial planning space," Stacker said.
He added there were opportunities for direct property product providers to be included on platforms, provided they were willing to design their products around platform requirements.
According to Stacker, demand for unlisted property syndicates and funds is increasingly being driven by self-managed super fund investors, with Charter Hall seeing strong interest from trustees and their advisers.
Recommended for you
Six months after scrapping its planned deal with KKR, Perpetual is yet to make significant headway on the sale of its wealth management division but is focusing on alternatives for product development.
Platinum Asset Management’s NPAT has fallen by 89 per cent in FY25, with the firm confirming that it will be renamed as L1 Group following the expected completion of its merger with L1 Capital.
Statutory NPAT at Pacific Current has almost halved in FY25 to $58.2 million as the result of an investment restructure.
Being able to provide certainty about redemptions is worth fund managers pursuing when targeting the retail market even if it means sacrificing returns, according to Federation Asset Management.