ESG outperformance depends on manager quality

12 June 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

There is no straight answer as to whether an environmental, social, or governance (ESG) fund performs better but a lot of the performance comes from the quality of the manager and style bias, according to AMP Capital. 

Speaking on a webinar, AMP Capital portfolio manager – multi asset group, Kristen Le Mesurier said she agreed with the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) that said ESG did not mean sacrificing returns and could add value, but that it came down to skill. 

“It’s a managers skill in identifying an ESG issue ahead of time, understanding they impact on earnings and share prices, and making stock selection decisions accordingly. That is where there’s value in ESG,” she said. 

Le Mesurier said that if a manager used a score from an external provider who did not consider earnings impact and making a call on that it was unlikely incorporating ESG factors would have an impact, and could even have a detrimental impact.  

“It comes down to the quality of the manager at taking ESG issues, thinking about them in earnings context,” she said. 

She noted that external data also did not capture style biases in an ESG fund. 

For example, she said, excluding the energy and resources sector due to a lack of environmental impact management and therefor a view that it would negatively impact earnings would tilt the portfolio relative to a benchmark and be underweight those sectors.  

If a fund was underweight financials due to reputation risk, it would likely be overweight healthcare and potentially technology and this was the inherent style bias. 

“Over the last few years in ESG funds globally, those biases have worked really well,” Le Mesurier said. 

“If you have a good manager that takes ESG issues and tilt the portfolio accordingly and you have style biases that works really well like technology and healthcare as they have been going gang busters and underweight the energy and financial sectors at a time when they have struggled for a range of reasons – you can see how that performs relative to a benchmark and all factors have an influence. 

“It’s not easy to say if you outperform with ESG or not. It’s more complicated than that.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

4 days 2 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 4 days ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 4 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND