Could China and US start a currency war?
China is a currency manipulator, but not how the Trump administration is claiming, according to market commentary from State Street Global Advisers.
After US President Donald Trump threatened further tariffs on China with 10 per cent on another $300 billion of Chinese imports, it was expected China would reply with retaliatory measures.
In the past the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) had been intervening directly and via capital controls to prevent the currency from weakening by buying large amounts of the yuan to keep it artificially high.
However, said they had not done it this time to engineer the price of their currency in their favour by not intervening.
Raf Choudhury, senior investment strategist at State Street Global Advisers, said the US could go to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), but they had previously sided with China over claims it was manipulating its currency.
“Whatever happens next, the likelihood is that [the yuan] will continue to weaken a bit further, and the probability of a full 25 per cent tariff on everything is much higher than before,” Choudhury said.
“The risk to the global growth outlook has increased and could lead to higher inflation and huge volatility in foreign exchange markets that investors should be prepared to weather.
“Potentially the US could start intervening directly although that might be the pot calling the kettle black.”
Recommended for you
The Federal Court has issued its verdict in ASIC's first greenwashing case against Vanguard Investments Australia regarding the use of ESG exclusionary screens.
Investment managers who plan to implement artificial intelligence in the next five years expect to see increased productivity, but views are mixed on whether it will boost revenue and assets under management.
A former corporate adviser has been sentenced in the Supreme Court of Western Australia for insider trading to realise a profit of more than $57,000.
Private markets expertise is sought-after for investment operations hires as allocations to alternative assets rise, according to a recruitment firm, but there is a gap between demand and supply.