Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Wholesale investors should be excluded from CSLR

treasury/SAFAA/Judith-Fox/

31 January 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

The fact that wholesale investors actively opt for that title and are required to undergo checks beforehand mean they should be excluded from the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR), according to the Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA).

Appearing before the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, SAFAA chief executive, Judith Fox, said she did not believe wholesale investors should be included in the scheme.

This was because they had actively taken steps to be classified in that sector so could be classed as financially literate and, secondly, would be able to afford any court fees arising in the event of misconduct.

To be classified as a wholesale investor, an investor would usually be investing at least $500,000 or have a gross income for the last two financial years of $250,000 or gross assets of at least $10 million.

Fox said: “Our view is that investors elect to become a wholesale investor, it is not an automatic process, no one can put them in that category without their consent, they have to get a certificate from an accountant.

“So we see that people are actively choosing to be wholesale investors and that comes with risks they take on.

“We don’t think that the scheme should extend to wholesale investors. They have the financial resources to be able to take matters through the court.”

She said firms usually undertook their own checks and risk matrices to ensure the person had the adequate investing experience, education and understanding of markets to meet the wholesale investor description.

She also added the Treasury review into the Australian Financial Complaints Authority had also noted the system was being “gamed” by wholesale investors.

“[Treasury] made it clear they think AFCA should be more careful in exercising its discretion to take complaints from wholesale investors because the system was being gamed, to some extent, by people who had financial resources to take matters through the court but could see they could use this free system. So extending the CSLR, we think, is not a wise idea.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 5 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND