What’s inside the government’s formal QAR response?

13 June 2023
| By Laura Dew |
expand image

The Government has issued its formal response to the Quality of Advice Review.

The recommendations were broken down into three streams; removing regulatory red tape that adds to the cost of advice without benefitting consumers, expand access to retirement income advice and exploring new channels to advice.

The final report from Michelle Levy had been issued in February.

Removing regulatory red tape that adds to the cost of advice without benefitting consumers:

  • The “Safe Harbour” steps, originally designed to protect financial advisers, will be removed from the Best Interest Duty with consultation to determine implementation details and the implications of adopting the remaining parts of recommendation 5 (accept in principle part of recommendation 5).
  • Ongoing fee renewal and consent requirements will be streamlined into a single form, and the requirement to provide a fee disclosure statement will be removed (accept recommendation 8).
  • Statements of Advice will be replaced with an advice record that is more fit-for-purpose, with consultation to determine the final design of the replacement (accept in principle recommendations 9);
  • More flexibility will be provided in how financial service guide requirements can be met (accept recommendation 10);
  • Standardised consumer consent requirements will be introduced to classify a consumer as a wholesale or sophisticated client (accept in principle recommendation 11);
  • Certain exemptions to the ban on conflicted remuneration will be simplified and some removed, including: 

–    clarifying that monetary or non-monetary benefits given by a client are not conflicted remuneration along with the removal of consequential exceptions (accept recommendations 13.1 and 13.3); 

–    removing an exception to conflicted remuneration rules for the issue of financial products where advice has not been provided in the previous 12 months (accept recommendation 13.4); and 

– removing an exception to conflicted remuneration rules for agents or employees of Australian Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (accept recommendation 13.5).

  • The Government will defer consideration of a review of time-sharing schemes (recommendation 13.6), until after the completion of Treasury’s review into the regulatory framework for Managed Investment Schemes;
  • Standardised consumer consent requirements will be introduced for life, general and consumer credit insurance commissions (accept recommendations 13.7 - 13.9).

Exploring new channels for advice:

  • In conjunction with implementing recommendation 6, the Government will explore expanding the provision of advice by other institutions by consulting industry and consumer stakeholders on recommendations to:
  • Broaden the definition of personal advice (recommendation 1)
  • Remove the general advice warning (recommendation 2)
  • Allow non-relevant providers to provide personal advice (recommendation 3)
  •  Introduce a good advice duty (recommendation 4)
  • Amend the Design and Distribution Obligations (recommendations 12.1 and 12.2)

This consultation will also finalise implementation details for:

  • The design of the replacement for Statements of Advice
  • The implementation details and the implications of adopting the remaining parts of recommendation 5.
  • The Financial Adviser Code of Ethics
  • Expanding access to affordable retirement advice.

Government consultation will test how these proposals might operate under different advice models, including digital advice models, and across sectors. Consultation will also consider practical policy design and implementation issues, including in relation to consumer protections.

The Government will issue its final response on the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes package later in 2023.

Expanding access to retirement income advice:

  • The restrictions on collective charging will be amended to allow superannuation funds to provide more retirement advice and information to their members (accept in principle recommendation 6).

–    This will work with industry to consider adopting, and tailoring as needed, recommendations 1-4, the remaining parts of recommendation 5, and recommendations 12.1 and 12.2 to implement recommendation 6.

Superannuation trustees will be provided with legal clarity around current practices for the payment of adviser service fees (accept in principle recommendation 7).


Read more about:


Submitted by Another easy answer on Tue, 2023-06-13 10:04

Ok expect a royal commission in 3 years when it's proven that garbage industry funds are providing vertical integration advice, rolling funds from better performed funds (either, other industry or retail funds) into their own poorly performed products. Reminds me of Happy Gilmour (it's like a carousel Happy").

If only someone who actually knew and cared about the industry made decisions on the matter, maybe there would be hope of getting it right...

Completely nuts and back to the same scenario that caused the issues in the first place!

Submitted by Matt Skehan on Tue, 2023-06-13 11:00

Lets see if they actually change the things that makes advice more costly (SOAs and Fee Consent work) rather than just unwind the RC and let any old product provider dish out advice to clients under the guise of "expanded personal advice definition" and the removal of "general advice". Seriously we have some idiot politicians who know nothing about their portfolio making a mockery of advice....yet again.

Submitted by Kell on Tue, 2023-06-13 14:18

As Kath Day-Night would say to Kimmy in 3 words...De- Ja-Vue

Submitted by Old Fella on Wed, 2023-06-14 20:27

Everything old is new again. Back to the future. i shake my head.

Submitted by Bamboo on Tue, 2023-12-19 15:44

IF we are still on the same road, i can assume nothing has changed

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you



sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry


My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

22 hours 48 minutes ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

23 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 day 22 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago