Systems, not planners to blame for fee for no service
The failure of bank operating protocols were a greater reason for fee for no service than the deliberate actions of financial advisers, according to Westpac chief executive, Brian Hartzer.
Giving evidence before the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Hartzer said that while there may have been some deliberate action on the part of advisers, “we would say that the majority of it is, effectively, a poor operating control around record keeping for the provision of advice”.
“There are some cases, of course, where we've had planners who perhaps have deliberately charged someone knowing they weren't going to provide the service. There have been others where there have been errors in people not following up,” he said. “But the majority of it - from what we can see so far - is to do with gaps in our record keeping.”
“So if I had my time over again, we'd take a very different approach to positively collecting, storing, demonstrating and confirming that customers were happy with the service that they had received, before we charged them,” Hartzer said.
Recommended for you
The RBA has made its latest interest rate decision at the the final monetary policy meeting of 2025.
State Street is actively seeking to launch ETFs in the Australian government, corporate and high yield bond space next year in order to capitalise on the phase-out of AT1 hybrids.
Greater consistency across the ASIC adviser exam has helped boost the number of first-time candidates this year with many opting to sit before undertaking a Professional Year.
Financial advice practice Eureka Whittaker Macnaught is in the process of acquiring three firms to boost its annual revenue to $25 million.
