Someone watching the watchers
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) may be one of the nation’s best resourced and best funded regulators, but it has been subject to less recent parliamentary scrutiny than the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), according to new research released by the Rule of Law Association of Australia.
The research, released late last week, examined the level of scrutiny directed at Commonwealth regulators by the Parliament, including the number of questions each regulator was asked, whether they made opening statements to Parliamentary committees and how quickly they responded to questions on notice.
The research found that while ASIC had more than twice the budget of the ACCC and chose to make opening statements to committees where the competition regulator did not, ASIC received less than half the time before committees compared to the ACCC and “often barely more time than APRA, which has one-third of ASIC’s budget”.
The Rule of Law Association analysis said the time squeeze experienced by ASIC might explain why it took a larger number of questions on notice.
The survey noted that ASIC took the most questions on notice of any of the regulators and added that with the exception of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, most of the regulators waited until after the due date to reply to those questions.
The survey provided as an example a due date for answers of 31 July last year, with ASIC providing answers on 18 August, 9 September and 21 October.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
