SOA disclosure and platform requirements raise doubts


One of the Statements of Advice (SOA) requirements has been labelled unncecesary duplication by a legal expert, echoing fears raised by advisers about the growing compliance burden.
However, for the most part, advisers preparing SOAs should have little problem meeting their legal requirements, according to The Fold's managing director Claire Wivell Plater.
She said the issues should be able to be resolved without a change of legislation and advisers should start by shortening SOA templates and removing unnecessary detail.
Nonetheless, Wivell Plater raised concerns about disclosing details at multiple points and platform disclosure requirements, but said advisers won't be able to circumvent the steps if the legislation stands as it is.
"If an adviser has an ongoing fee arrangement with the client, they should not be required to include information about their fees in every SoA, or even to incorporate it by reference," she said.
"The client receives this information in their annual fee disclosure statements. Similarly, there should be no need to repeat information about associations and relationships that have already been disclosed."
She said the platform requirements are similarly unrealistic and out of touch with the way advisers select platforms.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.