Pulling levers in super not enough to close gender gap
Changes to the super system are not enough to close the gender gap in retirement savings, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) believes.
While reforms such as extending the low income super contribution (LISC) scheme and removing the $450 monthly contribution limit are important, AIST said there were external issues to super than can have a much greater impact on either the gender gap or the fairness of the super system.
AIST said the major contributing factors to the retirement savings gap are pay inequity and constraints on female workplace participation.
AIST chief executive, Tom Garcia, said improving women's retirement outcomes is not just a matter of pulling levers inside the super system.
"If we are going to close the gap, we need a holistic approach, which includes a full examination of relevant policies outside of super," Garcia said.
"Legislating objectives for superannuation will hopefully put an end to ad hoc policy tinkering and provide a robust framework with which to assess any future policy proposals.
"After 25 years of compulsory super this is a long-overdue measure that will be particularly valuable both in tackling the gender savings gap and assisting the current Tax Inquiry."
Recommended for you
Sharing his reasoning in joining the FSC board, WT Financial chief executive, Keith Cullen, believes “product and advice cannot be separated” from each other in the current environment.
The Emerge Foundation, a charity run by financial advisers and fund managers, has announced a scholarship program to help veterans transition into tertiary education.
In an open letter, Sequoia chief executive Garry Crole has hit out against shareholders “with a personal axe to grind” as he fights for his job ahead of an EGM.
The JAWG has announced it is in talks with Treasury around five “core principles” to strengthen the education standards for new entrants to the financial advice space.
