Pulling levers in super not enough to close gender gap
Changes to the super system are not enough to close the gender gap in retirement savings, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) believes.
While reforms such as extending the low income super contribution (LISC) scheme and removing the $450 monthly contribution limit are important, AIST said there were external issues to super than can have a much greater impact on either the gender gap or the fairness of the super system.
AIST said the major contributing factors to the retirement savings gap are pay inequity and constraints on female workplace participation.
AIST chief executive, Tom Garcia, said improving women's retirement outcomes is not just a matter of pulling levers inside the super system.
"If we are going to close the gap, we need a holistic approach, which includes a full examination of relevant policies outside of super," Garcia said.
"Legislating objectives for superannuation will hopefully put an end to ad hoc policy tinkering and provide a robust framework with which to assess any future policy proposals.
"After 25 years of compulsory super this is a long-overdue measure that will be particularly valuable both in tackling the gender savings gap and assisting the current Tax Inquiry."
Recommended for you
Two commentators have shared why cultural alignment can be the biggest deal breaker when it comes to advice M&A and how to ensure a successful fit.
Formal education has played a large role in enhancing the advice profession over the last decade but, with the bar now so high, two advisers debate whether it is necessary to complete additional study.
With an abundance of private market options coming to market, due diligence becomes increasingly important as advisers separate the wheat from the chaff, adviser Charlie Viola has said.
The Treasury has launched a consultation into how the $47 million special levy for the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort will be funded.
