Offshoring more strategic than cost-cutting alone: Sundaram

29 May 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Most companies using business process outsourcing (BPO) are motivated by the opportunities to expand their client offering and not simply cost-cutting, according to India-based Sundaram Business Services. 

In a white paper published on Sundaram’s website, the outsourcing company, reported that an independent survey of directors of companies using BPO services ranked access to scale and faster processing, as having a higher impact on their businesses than lower cost. 

Global Head of Business Development at Sundaram Business Services, Harish Rao, said the perception that offshoring roles was a tool for cost savings for accountancy firms was a “misconception”. 

“More professional services firms see BPO as a multi-dimensional business asset and are using it strategically to help drive growth,” he said. 

“The idea of BPO as merely a cost-cutting mechanism is fast becoming out-dated.” 

Data from the company’s whitepaper cited Accenture’s 2012 Research Report Achieving high performance in BPO, which suggested that high performing businesses tended to be less motivated by cost when considering BPO.  

The Accenture report found that two-thirds of high-performance businesses focused on the potential value of business benefits beyond cost alone, when considering adopting BPO.  

“Pick up a newspaper or business magazine and the concept of BPO, offshoring or outsourcing is overwhelmingly described as a strategy geared towards cost cutting,” the company said. “But in professional services the reality is often different, and BPO has more strategic aims.  

“Professional services firms have other motivations beyond cost for engaging BPO, such as managing a seasonal or fluctuating workload, accessing the security and efficiency benefits of scale and accessing a ready available pool of talent. 

“The ability to offshore accounting tasks, while re-orienting staff toward higher value goals aimed at increasing revenues, is where BPO is most powerful. 

“This has overwhelmingly been the case in Sundaram Business Services’ experience of SMSF processing, where more accountants and superannuation administrators are outsourcing processing work in order to concentrate on their core business.” 

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 21 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 22 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND