No SOA? ASIC says you’ll pay

compliance/SOA/financial-planners/federal-government/

28 April 2005
| By Ross Kelly |

By Ross Kelly

THE chair of the AustralianSecurities and InvestmentsCommission (ASIC), Jeffrey Lucy, has issued a warning to financial planners that if they fail to comply with choice of fund legislation they face harsh punishment.

The warning came during a speech Lucy recently gave to the Committee for Economic Development in Sydney.

Lucy said advisers who did not provide clients with a statement of advice (SOA) would be specifically targeted, despite acknowledging the Federal Government was in the process of changing the SOA rules because they were proving too onerous for advisers.

“...where there are new provisions and if people are making a genuine attempt to comply, we will be balanced in our approach,” Lucy said.

“Where the provisions are not new, where the legislature has deliberately imposed strict liability, or where people are disregarding the law, we will adopt our usual strong approach to enforcement.”

“Not providing an SOA is clearly in the latter category.”

Lucy’s warning about a crackdown on SOA compliance comes just weeks after the corporate watchdog’s controversial prosecution of Hobart-based adviser Brendan Moore, who failed to give four clients SOAs, even though the clients experienced no financial loss and still expressed happiness with the adviser’s services.

“SOAs are a primary consumer protection tool under FSRA and all the more relevant where switching of super is concerned because of the long-term implications of a switching decision and the important provisions covering the costs and benefits of switching someone’s retirement savings,” Lucy said.

The warning also follows further reassurance from Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer Chris Pearce that changes to the SOA rules were imminent.

In a speech to a Credit Union Services Corporation forum in Sydney he said that a series of proposed refinements to FSR legislation, including a possible shortening of the length of SOAs, would be made public “in the near future”.

Lucy also backed ASIC’s controversial second shadow shopping exercise, which he said would begin “around the start of super choice in July”.

“The shadow shopping technique gives strong insights into the consumer’s real life experience of getting advice, and we will be seeking to check whether the financial advice they receive complies with the law, including whether advisers have met their legal obligations related to switching.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 6 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

6 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo