No reason for APRA to regulate SMSFs



Self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) should not be propelled under the jurisdiction of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and should remain within the remit of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), according to the Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals' Association (SPAA).
Reacting to claims by officials within the industry funds sector that SMSFs should be subject to the same oversight as APRA-regulated funds, SPAA chief executive Andrea Slattery said the ATO represented the right regulatory body to oversee the SMSF sector.
"The claim is that the SMSF sector is under-regulated; nothing could be further from the truth," she said.
Slattery pointed out that the ATO had always regulated the taxation of SMSFs and APRA-regulated funds, and had regulated the administration and operation of SMSFs since 1999.
She said that under the Labor government, the ATO had been handed prudential powers by APRA to regulate the auditors, actuaries and trustees of SMSFs, and that the ATO's powers included regulating fraud and theft - something which APRA could not do with respect to the Trio collapse.
"The fact remains that APRA does not have the resources to oversee nearly 500,000 SMSFs, with its audit program simply not structured to handle small funds," Slattery said.
"By contrast, the ATO has been able to build the resources and the expertise, which is why SMSFs were transferred to the ATO in 1999."
Recommended for you
Two commentators have shared why cultural alignment can be the biggest deal breaker when it comes to advice M&A and how to ensure a successful fit.
Formal education has played a large role in enhancing the advice profession over the last decade but, with the bar now so high, two advisers debate whether it is necessary to complete additional study.
With an abundance of private market options coming to market, due diligence becomes increasingly important as advisers separate the wheat from the chaff, adviser Charlie Viola has said.
With the final tally for FY25 now confirmed, how many advisers left during the financial year and how does it compare to the previous year?