Medicare Australia's performance under scrutiny
Medicare Australia, the agency the Federal Government has appointed to act as the superannuation clearing house for small employers, has received a critical analysis from the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) regarding its handling of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).
An ANAO report, tabled in the Parliament yesterday, broadly endorsed Medicare’s administration of the PBS — but it also pointed to a number of deficiencies, including the accuracy of claims processing and performance. It also found that better operational guidance should be provided to key decision-makers.
The ANAO report has been tabled at a time when other, specialist superannuation clearing house operators have questioned the ability of Medicare to handle the task demanded of it by the Government.
Among the issues raised by the ANAO was its observation that Medicare Australia had adopted a practice “of adjusting Medicare Australia’s authority approval records to accord with the medicines actually dispensed in cases where there was a mismatch”.
The report said this practice carried with it the risk of failing to react to, or manage, evidence of incorrect dispensing of medicines.
It noted that Medicare had advised that it intends to address the issue through its nationally consistent quality control action plan, which it has recently endorsed.
Medicare has responded to the ANAO report by accepting the majority of its recommendations, some of which it said had been already implemented.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Adviser numbers have experienced their largest weekly loss year-to-date this week, doubling that of the previous week.
The number of advisers currently using or planning to use artificial intelligence in their practices has risen substantially to almost three-quarters of firms, according to Adviser Ratings.
Morningstar believes there is still further to run with the potential takeover of Insignia Financial even with original bidder Bain Capital walking away.
Large AFSLs with more than 100 advisers are seeing the largest losses in both adviser and AFSL numbers as individuals seek a smaller, personal vision in their work.
