Light-touch regulation needed for advice profession: FSC

4 May 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Advice should be treated with the respect given to doctors or lawyers as the industry has successfully improved itself to become a profession, according to Financial Services Council chief executive Blake Briggs.

Speaking to Money Management, Briggs, who took over as CEO in March after an acting period, said he believed the industry had successful improved its standing with the public.

“[Lawyers and doctors] are treated with the respect they deserve and I think advice is now in that space and should be treated with a lot more respect, particularly in Canberra, than it is by a lot of participants.

“Here is the opportunity to treat it like a profession, treat it with respect, have a lighter-touch regulatory regime and trust the professional judgement of individual advisers. They are the ones who sit down with the clients, who know their best interests and how to deliver them.”

Referencing the Quality of Advice Review, he said he was pleased the Government was acting promptly to assess the impact of the financial services Royal Commission. The challenge for Michelle Levy, he said, would be to establish which issues were going to be her focus from a very broad remit.

“If we had a backward-looking review looking at regulatory change over the last decade, it would be much more difficult to achieve consensus because we’d be picking over the embers of prior battles. What we need to do now is focus on what to do next and what is the regulatory regime appropriate for the future.

“Traditionally reviews result in the ratcheting up of the regulatory overlay but I think there’s optimism that we’re going in the opposite direction. This review is about what sensible changes can be made to deregulate the industry.

“If you look at the journey that advice has been on, so much of it has been about getting the advice industry to a point where it is recognised as a profession and our view is that has worked.

“The regulatory overlay required to get to the profession isn't the same one you need when it is a profession. So we need a lighter touch regulatory system that reflects the professionalised nature of advice as opposed to the heavy-handed approach that was required to get it.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND