Industry divided over ALRC’s rules advisory committee plan

FSC/FPA/siaa/ALRC/

6 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

There is debate among industry associations about the benefits of a ‘rules advisory committee’ as  proposed by the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC).

It was supported by the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA) which said “mandatory consultation is vital to ensure transparency in the use of delegated legislative powers and to protect democratic processes in establishing legal requirements”.

The Stockbrokers and Investment Advisers Association (SIAA) also welcomed the proposals as it believed it would help reduce minor breach reports. Currently, SIAA said, the Corporations Act was “littered” with civil penalty provisions which meant breach reports were needed for matters that were minor, technical or inadvertent.

However, SIAA did have minor issues regarding the inclusion of consumer groups on the panel.

However, the Financial Services Council (FSC) disagreed that a committee of this type should be established as it would and that meaningful public consultation with industry groups, consumer groups and legal experts should suffice.

“The FSC does not support a rules advisory committee (or similar) being established by the Corporations Act which must be consulted by the Minister or ASIC (as the case may be) before scoping orders or rules are made.

“The FSC submits that instead of a rules advisory committee (or similar), public and transparent consultations processes, that allow all impacted parties to come forward are more appropriate and have been the longstanding approach in Australia. A public consultation process should already capture all relevant stakeholders.”

Costs and funding were another issue for the FSC as this had not been disclosed by the ALRC and it recommended it was not funded by financial services industry participants.

“The FSC notes that financial services industry participants already pay significant sums in respect of other regulatory activities (notably pursuant to the ASIC Industry Funding Model, to APRA via the Financial Institutions Supervisory Levies, the proposed Compensation Scheme of Last Resort, and various professional industry associations, to name a few).”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 5 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS