Industry backs recommendation to scrap ban on exit fees

government-and-regulation/government/mortgage-choice/chief-executive/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

image
image image
expand image

A Senate committee on competition in Australia’s banking sector has recommended the Government reconsider its proposed ban on exit fees, with much industry support.

The Senate’s Economic References Committee stated that rather than abolishing exit fees, it recommended the Government give the recent ban on unreasonable exit fees by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) a chance to work.

It also said it was notable that the only financial intermediaries that openly welcomed the ban of exit fees were the major banks.

Mortgage Choice chief executive Michael Russell strongly supported the committee’s recommendation on exit fees due to the unperceived adverse effects it would have on competition.

“Should the Gillard Government unilaterally ban exit fees, then it will unwittingly hand over on a plate the heads of the non-banks to the major banks.

“Why? They are reliant upon this fee to be able to remain competitive at the front end, where real competition counts for the consumer,” Russell said in Mortgage Choice’s submission to the Treasurer.

Mortgage provider FirstMac also welcomed the recommendations, with managing director Kim Cannon stating a ban on exit fees would likely create a class of ‘rate shoppers’ which would increase costs for all lenders, with costs passed on to consumers.

But Cannon said he did not agree with the senate committee’s further recommendation that if a ban were to be implemented, that it should only apply to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADI).

Cannon said he did not think it would create a truly level playing field, and it would erode the benefits of competition for consumers.

The Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) chief executive Phil Naylor (pictured) disagreed, stating if a ban on exit fees were to be introduced, small lenders should be exempt.

“The deferred establishment fee (which was considered an exit fee) brought down the margin on home loans for thousands of Australians,” he said.

“Lenders such as Aussie and Wizard used the deferred establishment fee to reduce mortgage costs and compete with the banks.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo