Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Govt urged to define aligned and non-aligned planners

financial-planners/AIST/FOFA/financial-planning/financial-advice/superannuation-trustees/future-of-financial-advice/commonwealth-bank/government/

12 December 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Government should legislate to draw a distinction between aligned and independent financial planners, according to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

The AIST has used its submission to the Senate Economics committee inquiry into the Scrutiny of Financial Advice, to call for the clearer identification of aligned and independent planners at the same time as claiming that high levels of bank ownership of financial planning resources was serving to conflict the market.

It said that by naming those planners which are bank-aligned and those which were independent would "assist with raising consumer awareness about which financial planners are inherently conflicted".

The AIST submission pointed to recent research produced by the Customer Owned Banking Association suggesting that Australia had the most concentrated banking sector of any G20 country and to other research claiming that the four largest banks, their wealth arms and AMP had coverage of over 55 per cent of all financial planners and 79 per cent of all platform advisers.

Its submission claimed that "such conflicts of interest have detrimentally flowed onto consumers in various financial planning scandals, including in recent times the Commonwealth Bank and Macquarie Bank".

"Structurally, it is difficult to ensure that consumers are as fully protected as they should be, given the structural conflict of interest arising from not having a clean separation of banking from wealth management," it said.

The submission also claimed the current level of consumer protection was insufficient and that even those provided by the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes fell short, and stated that the AIST was concerned that there existed no uniform professional code for financial planners.

"Given the inherent structural conflicts involved in the financial planning sector, AIST strongly contends that a voluntary code would not provide consumers with adequate protection. Such a code should be separate to membership of a professional body," it said. "Given the public scandals and the erosion of consumer confidence, AIST suggests that such a code could be developed under the operation of an ASIC regulatory guide."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 weeks ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

4 weeks 1 day ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3