FASEA Standard 3 consultation genuine process: AFA

10 November 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has said it believes the education authority’s consultation on amending Standard 3 of its code of ethics is a genuine process.

This followed earlier comments that the Financial Adviser Ethics and Standards Authority’s (FASEA’s) consultation paper suggesting it had preferred the second option it provided the industry with on changes to Standard 3.

AFA general manager for policy and professionalism, Phil Anderson, said he believed the consultation was a genuine exercise and encouraged advisers and those in the financial advice industry to make submissions.

“Most of us would favour the first option and FASEA have provided alternatives for others to express their view on,” he said.

“There’s four weeks of consultation so we should get an outcome before the end of the year because they’ll no longer have power in 2022. They’ll need to register a change to the legislative instrument and get that legislative instrument registered by the end of the year.”

The first option given by FASEA to amend Standard 3 was: “You must only advise, refer or act where you do not have a conflict of interest or duty, being that which could reasonably be expected to induce you to act other than in the client’s best interest”.

Anderson said the AFA wanted FASEA to be clear that this would apply when there was a material conflict and not for incidental or peripheral conflict.

“In terms of the guidance, want to be very clear that it says, for example, that life insurance commission's don't invalidate that point about reasonable and inducing someone to act in a way that's inconsistent with the best interests of the client,” he said.

“It's good that they are looking at making a change, and if option one is the outcome then at least it's a much better outcome than Standard 3 as it is now as any conflict is a breach of the standard.”

Anderson noted that even if the Standard was enacted as it was currently worded there was room in the guidance to do what was currently permitted by law, which was to be paid a commission for life insurance advice as long as the advice was consistent with the best interest of the client.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 16 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 17 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND