Extend legal privilege to planners says FPA

31 January 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) wants relationships between financial planners and their clients to be entitled to the same legal privilege as that which exists between lawyers and their clients.

The FPA has used its 2017/18 Budget submission to renew its argument for "advice privilege" to be granted to qualifying communications between planners and their clients, arguing that in the legal profession it is regarded as the right of the client.

"This privilege is considered a right of the client rather than the (legal) professional, and it has its roots in the notion that fairness and public interest require a client being able to make full and frank disclosures to their professional adviser without the risk of prejudice and damage by subsequent compulsory admission," it said.

The FPA submission said that extending professional privilege to other advice relationships was something which would be consistent with recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission and urged that the Government deliver ‘statutory provisions to ensure all practitioners receive professional privilege, in defined circumstances, relevant to the areas of law they provide advice in (i.e. taxation, superannuation, social security, etc)".

The submission said it was widely viewed that legal professional privilege (LPP) was necessary to ensure proper administration of justice but under common law, LPP only extended to the client-lawyer relationship.

"In 2007 the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) delivered a report, "Privilege in Perspective: Client Legal Privilege in Federal Investigations", which reviewed LPP in the context of federal investigatory bodies," it said. "….one of the major recommendations of the ALRC report was that privilege be extended, in defined circumstances, to include tax advice provided by accountants."

The submission noted that such an extension would formalise the accountant's exemption and would bring Australia into line with the position in the United Kingdom, the US and New Zealand.

"It was noted in the 2007 ALRC report that the fact that the same advice can be given by accountants and lawyers on taxation matters as the crucial factor in their push for the extension of privilege to taxation advice. On the same basis this should also extend to financial planners providing the same advice," the FPA submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND