Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

‘Extend anti-hawking laws to advisers’ cold calls’: AIST

AIST/super-fund/financial-advice/regulation/

2 February 2023
| By Rhea Nath |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has advocated for banning unsolicited calls to consumers from advisers and financial planning businesses in an extension of existing anti-hawking legislation.

Though superannuation products were subject to the laws, per recommendations by the Hayne Royal Commission, it did not extend to financial services like advice, AIST chief executive Eva Scheerlinck argued, adding that a number of firms used intermediaries to solicit business through these means.

She outlined cases where super fund members would receive cold calls from an intermediary generating business for a financial planner, cautioning them about their current “high risk” fund. The member would then receive documents over email, like a completed application for a retail fund and an invoice for advice that was not provided, to be signed. 

It resulted in consumers rolling over from high-performing, low fee profit-to-member funds to poorer-performing retail funds, shelling out up to $6,000 in adviser fees in the process.

“A number of these cases have been reported to [the Australian Securities and Investments Commission] and while ASIC may be able to pursue the advisers for poor advice, this is a time-consuming ‘whack a mole’ approach that does not address the systemic risk to customers,” Scheerlinck elaborated.

In a pre-Budget submission to Government, she noted “the same imbalance of power exists in the unsolicited sale of financial services as in the unsolicited sale of financial products”.

“We all know the feeling of receiving an unsolicited call from a number we don’t recognise and speaking to somebody we don’t know who is trying to sell us something we don’t need or even want,” she stated.

“When they’re selling financial services like super advice to skirt around a gap in the law and trying to bamboozle consumers with half-truths into signing up for a costly service that is not in their financial interests, it should be outlawed.”

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Realistic on Thu, 2023-02-02 09:38

FUM - follow the money. "It resulted in consumers rolling over from high-performing, low fee profit-to-member funds to poorer-performing retail funds, shelling out up to $6,000 in adviser fees in the process."
Is why we have all the red tape - and product providers don't? Seems these low fee profit-to-member funds have benefited from the elimination of the Banks/AMP and are looking set to benefit from Michelle Levy's recommendations.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 6 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 6 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

3 weeks 6 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3